unimatrix001, on Jan 5 2008, 04:57 PM, said:
i use AVG up to this day and it works like a charm. every so often i would run nod32 just to make sure and it finds nothing that AVG hasnt already found.i donno,people have their preference,i stayin with AVG for now. anyway back to the topic
max simultaneous connections is the problem here. paradyne and speedstream i know for sure cant handle more than 35 simultaneous connections properly so i set my torrents to use only 30 and everything works nicely, and torrents come down at around 29K. NB tho im supposedly blinked at the time of writing this, my regular DSL was 512k and my blink supposed to be 2Mb. why i have gone backwards i know not why but im workin on getting a "supervisor" to my house.
i like flows setup cus their modem is just a bridge so you can have (and i have tested properly) the full 65535 simultaneous connections if you have a computer directly connected to the modem or through a hub/switch. adding a router now (and i dont own one,i try an avoid as much as possible) such as a cheep CNET router that i used for a setup by a friend, would reduce this amount of simul cnx since dat one in particular only handled 20:s anyway its just a $150router... but i know those expensive ones like LINKSYS etc could support all kinda 300.
i just wish flow would come by me fast so i cud finally have freedom and can be leased a public IP directly and dont have port forwarding, NAT an da shit to worry bout
max simultaneous connections is the problem here. paradyne and speedstream i know for sure cant handle more than 35 simultaneous connections properly so i set my torrents to use only 30 and everything works nicely, and torrents come down at around 29K. NB tho im supposedly blinked at the time of writing this, my regular DSL was 512k and my blink supposed to be 2Mb. why i have gone backwards i know not why but im workin on getting a "supervisor" to my house.
i like flows setup cus their modem is just a bridge so you can have (and i have tested properly) the full 65535 simultaneous connections if you have a computer directly connected to the modem or through a hub/switch. adding a router now (and i dont own one,i try an avoid as much as possible) such as a cheep CNET router that i used for a setup by a friend, would reduce this amount of simul cnx since dat one in particular only handled 20:s anyway its just a $150router... but i know those expensive ones like LINKSYS etc could support all kinda 300.
i just wish flow would come by me fast so i cud finally have freedom and can be leased a public IP directly and dont have port forwarding, NAT an da shit to worry bout
Is that where the max rwin 65535 comes from?